calender day造句

• :: : : I understand completely that the 3RR rule applies to any consecutive 24 hour period, not to calender days . I also fully acknowledge that I reverted the disputed article four times within one 24 hour period.
• Some confusion arose because I wished to keep distinct " day " meaning calender day = 24 hours during which the observed elevation of the center of the Sun returns to any angle, and " daylight time ".
• My point is that blocking someone on the second day of reverting a disputed article, when he reverted the article only 3 times on one calender day and only twice on the next, for a total of FIVE reverts in TWO days, is a rather zealous application of the 3RR rule.
• The administrator blocked me after the SECOND revert for a calender day, because this revert was only 22 hours ( rather than 24 hours ) after the first of two reverts on the previous calender day, making a total of four reverts with a single 24 hour period . . . even though I explicitly explained my intention to stay within the 3RR limit.
• The administrator blocked me after the SECOND revert for a calender day, because this revert was only 22 hours ( rather than 24 hours ) after the first of two reverts on the previous calender day, making a total of four reverts with a single 24 hour period . . . even though I explicitly explained my intention to stay within the 3RR limit.
• If you are so vigilant to take pre-emptive action against ME based on a message in which I indicated that I would ADHERE to the 3RR policy ( albeit with a mis-interpretation of the 24 hour versus calender day ), why do these blatent statements of Ed Schaefer voicing his intention to VIOLATE two of the most important Wiki policies not prompt you to take action against HIM ? ( By the way, that's a rhetorical question . . . I have never sought to have anyone blocked, silenced, or censored, and I will not start now .)